December 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, May 14th, 2010 11:35 pm
Sparked by ongoing wank on FFR and FFRR...

I'm going to post several icons here, the cause of the wank. I would like people's interpretation of them, devoid of all context or knowledge of who really owns them. This means that [livejournal.com profile] delwynmarch, [livejournal.com profile] tea_fiend and [livejournal.com profile] agenttrojie should probably not comment.

1


2


3


4


5


6


7


8


9


10


11
Friday, May 14th, 2010 11:56 pm (UTC)
Well, I have resisted the urge to run off to FFR and FFRR to see what's going on long enough to look at them. I'm really horrible at telling ages, but the girl looks young enough to make it pretty squicky - especially 1 ( combination of naked chest and little girl) and yeah, definitely the ones that actually have "lolicon" on them. 3 isn't too bad, and some of the others I could see as innocent if I tried, but I would understand if people found them squicky.

*runs off to FFR and FFRR*
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 07:16 am (UTC)
It was 7 and 11 I originally objected to. I named those ones specifically in my original comment. She's... I'm not sure where her and her friend are getting half their claims from, to be honest.

As for the bit about me setting a friend on them... I did nothing of the sort, because I'd stepped out of the conversation by the that point, when she asked if her default was okay, then changed her default icon to 1 and changed every single one of her icons in the post to match.
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 03:44 am (UTC)
Um... someone really likes a lolicon ship?
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 07:14 am (UTC)
Likes it, is very vocal about it and thinks that pictures have no meaning in themselves when removed from context and mental associations. I wanted to make sure the wank wasn't just me seeing an icon and interpreting it badly because of who was using it.
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 07:19 pm (UTC)
For what it's worth, I've since checked out what's going on, and um. Well. Your initial request was actually pretty polite, and everything that followed looks to me, at least, like they were the ones escalating things further and further.

Anyway, it's hard for me, at least, to see a lot of those as innocent. And I'd never heard of this girl before all this.
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 04:33 am (UTC)
I thought we weren't going to do the paedophilia shit, because it's my birthday and I wanted a day off from it.
Saturday, May 15th, 2010 07:13 am (UTC)
S'why I put them beneath a cut, so you wouldn't have to see them unless you clicked on it.